Glasgow Warriors | Real autonomy would give Glasgow a chance
Share

Next article
Previous article
Got an opinion?
Discuss this article in the comments section or register with the glasgowwarriors.com forum.

Search this site

March 29, 2007

Real autonomy would give Glasgow a chance

Posted by Editor on March 29, 2007 08:00 AM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail author
Brian Simmers yesterday welcomed the SRU's decision to close the Borders team and push more funding into Glasgow, but warned the union that there were no great stores of wealth to be tapped into in Scotland's largest city.

The former Scotland international is one of the best-placed judges of what kind of support rugby can receive in Glasgow, having worked within the business and rugby communities to form the ambitious new Glasgow Hawks club in 1997 and spent most of last year scouring the wider Glasgow district for help in putting together a plan to franchise the pro team from the SRU.

Speakin in The Scotsman, he admitted he found willing sponsors of several thousands of pounds, perhaps even hundreds of thousands, but no millions being offered to rugby and so had to pull the plug on the effort he made with business partner David Mackay, the former SRU chairman.

Simmers remains hopeful, however, that the union's pledge to appoint a chief executive with real autonomy would give the Glasgow team a chance.

"I have to say I don't think the big-money boys around Glasgow will be interested in investing in a professional team no matter how well run or successful it may be," he said. "But there is the opportunity to bring more funds to the table if the SRU is serious about putting together a much bigger marketing approach under the new chief executive, with the opportunity for hospitality and merchandising, because the lack of a marketing team and plan has been a massive problem.

"That needs to be introduced and if it is then they can start to get round the corporate markets of Glasgow and the greater Glasgow district and we might see some success.

"But, crucially, the union has to establish an independent board, answerable to the union, yes, but with more of an independence. And if they're taking that route and it is seen to be independent there could well be support, but that has to be a clear message from the union and the board. I've had my go and couldn't find the funds we needed to make a professional team work, but my hope is that this announcement means the SRU are going to introduce a much bigger injection of funding.

"I support the decision because pro rugby needs funding and needs success, which should start attracting bigger crowds, but whether there is much greater amounts of money to be uncovered in Glasgow we'll have to wait and see."

Simmers pointed to Scotstoun Stadium and its £11m redevelopment as perfect for the new, improved Glasgow, if the SRU can get its collective head around using temporary seating to cover the athletics track, and he supported the decision taken to cut the Reivers from the professional map.

"They should have made this decision years ago," he said. "In fact, they should never have brought the Borders back in 2002. That was Jim Telfer calling the shots and no-one being prepared to stand up against him. I don't agree that it will be bad for Borders rugby because I think pro rugby sits almost separate to what's going on at the next level. This is a business and these decisions should not be emotional, but commercial.

"You don't open a third shop until you have the existing two working well and the amount of money ploughed in to pro rugby in Scotland trying to get all the 'shops' working has been incredible.

"I also feel two properly-funded pro sides is enough in Scotland, because it gives you 70 players and with around 20 outwith the country you have enough competing for the national team."

Posted by gnasher on March 29, 2007 01:18 PM | Reply to this comment

Couldn't agree more. What we need now is long term commitment to the base in Glasgow. Long term commitment to players. A binding agreement with the City Council to work out a pragmatic development plan for Scotstoun. With those in place people will start to buy season tickets, buy the hospitality packages which will build the identity and success of the team. Quite frankly the shor termism and uncertainty of the last few years must have driven potential supporters, backers away.

Posted by Phall on March 29, 2007 01:49 PM | Reply to this comment

Disagree totally. I think that pro-rugby has reached it's top level and there is nowhere to go from here.

This appears to be as good as it gets.

Posted by Alistair on March 30, 2007 11:05 AM | Reply to this comment

Given that 3000 more people per game on average were coming to Glagow matches 4/5 seaons ago I think there's definite room for improvement.

Posted by Phall on March 30, 2007 12:07 PM | Reply to this comment

Were they really?

Whilst those were the reported figures, when you look around at Hughenden when busy now, you realise how much of that was just exaggeration.

Posted by monkeyman on March 29, 2007 05:11 PM | Reply to this comment

I couldn't agree more wish gnasher though. How is a pro-team supposed to generate support when there future is so uncertain.

Posted by Ed on March 30, 2007 11:21 PM | Reply to this comment

This couldn't possibly be the same Brian Simmers who shot the clubs down in flames in 1996 for their ambitions of playing in European competition and voicing his strong support for the Scottish District setup to take part in European competition?

The same Brian Simmers who, a year later once in position with Glasgow Hawks in 1997, changed his tune ever so delightfully and said it should be the clubs who should be playing in European competition and that the District setup should be abolished to let the club sides take on Europe's best sides?

Add a comment to this article

If you're replying to an existing comment, please use the 'Reply to this comment' link above the entry. This will display the comments in a way which is far easier for other readers to follow.