Next article
Previous article
Got an opinion?
Discuss this article in the comments section or register with the glasgowwarriors.com forum.

Search this site

August 02, 2006

Warriors 'must stay in Glasgow'

Posted by Editor on August 2, 2006 07:48 AM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail author

Davind Mackay says the Warriors must stay in Glasgow
David Mackay, one of the key players in a bid to take the running of Glasgow Warriors into private ownership has insisted the professional rugby team's short and long-term future must be in the city.

The former Scottish Rugby Union chairman, is confident that his plans in partnership with Brian Simmers, the Glasgow Hawks president, will be finalised following discussions with major corporations this month.

The SRU are about to announce where Warriors will play this season, and Mackay said it is vital they continue to send the right signals to the Glasgow public, local politicians and the business community.

"Our view is that Scotstoun is the place for Glasgow rugby and, in our talks with Glasgow City Council, they have been hugely supportive," said Mackay in The Herald.

As that is at least two and probably three years from being available, he knows that the SRU have to come up with an interim plan and has sympathy with their difficulties in identifying a suitable location.

Facilities at Hughenden, their former home, are still unsuitable so Firhill remains the likeliest option for the coming season. However, West Of Scotland's Burnbrae ground has emerged as a serious option.

Gordon McKie, the SRU's chief executive, sought to make it clear that options are being kept as wide as possible, and said temporary use of Falkirk FC's new stadium could be considered.

In terms of established facilities, it probably offers a better option than any of those in the Greater Glasgow area, but Mackay is convinced that it would be a dangerous road to go down.

"I can understand the pressure of the economics, but [Glasgow Warriors] is a brand that has an opportunity to be built then strengthened," he said. "Moving [it] out of Glasgow would be the wrong message to send to the council, supporters and to sponsors."

The timing is all the more sensitive because of the negotiations in which he and Simmers are about to engage.

"We've got two big meetings in the next two-and-a-half weeks and the high probability of another two with some major players," explained Mackay. "Everything hinges on those discussions, and it has been hugely encouraging that there have been no leaks so far from those we've been sharing our information with.

"It is hard work but there has been no dampening of Brian's or my enthusiasm."

Mackay said he remained optimistic that he and his partners would be able to unveil a detailed plan for taking over the running of the pro team by September.

Comments
Posted by ajm686 on August 2, 2006 10:31 AM | Reply to this comment

Fingers crossed....

Posted by Andrew Nisbet on August 9, 2006 05:38 PM | Reply to this comment

David Mackay is quite right. I, for one would not travel to Falkirk but will to any of the mooted Glasgow venues although my preference would be Hughenden. In the short term 3,000 in there is a big crowd which could build the right atmosphere and support. All the Glasgow rugby grounds need some money spent on them so why not Hughenden.

Add a comment to this article

If you're replying to an existing comment, please use the 'Reply to this comment' link above the entry. This will display the comments in a way which is far easier for other readers to follow.