Glasgow Warriors | Borders axed
Share

Next article
Previous article
Got an opinion?
Discuss this article in the comments section or register with the glasgowwarriors.com forum.

Search this site

March 27, 2007

Borders axed

Posted by Editor on March 27, 2007 12:32 PM | 9 comments | Print | E-mail author
Scottish Rugby has completed its wide ranging review of pro team rugby and confirmed its commitment to maintain professional rugby in Scotland.

The Scottish Rugby Board has decided to provide additional funding to its Glasgow Warriors pro team to enable it to strengthen and increase the squad size and invest in improved facilities.

This will be made possible by the Board’s decision to close the Border Reivers at the end of this season, which will result in a number of Reivers players transferring to the Warriors.

The Board recognised that, unlike other northern hemisphere nations, professional rugby in Scotland has struggled since the sport turned professional in 1995. In that period, Scottish Rugby has invested around £30 million in its various pro teams, yet the concept of pro team rugby in Scotland has never fully taken off.

The Board was however united in its belief that if Scotland is to continue to aspire to maintain its status as a top ten international rugby nation, (Scotland is currently ranked tenth in the world) then pro team rugby in Scotland supporting the Scotland national squad, is essential.

In carrying out its review, the Board examined levels of investment, pro team numbers and locations, training and playing facilities, squad sizes, relationships with and participation in the Heineken Cup and Magners League, third party investors and academies.

It assessed the current condition of pro team rugby in Scotland in the context of its vision for the future. The Board considers the following to be factors that make for successful professional rugby:

* A quality playing squad of at least 35 full time professionals able to be competitive all season, including during Scotland international Test periods

• The funding ability to recruit and retain top players

• Good training and support facilities

• Maintaining an Academy structure which takes part in regular back-up games

• A modern, seated and covered stadium of 6,000-10,000 capacity in or close to a large population, with public access, parking and hospitality facilities

• A good match day atmosphere, attractive to a TV broadcaster

• Strong commercial growth potential

The Board decided that, in the context of its significant bank debt, to maintain pro team rugby in Scotland in any meaningful way, it could not provide long term support to both its existing teams, Border Reivers and Glasgow Warriors, in their present form.

It recognised that the funding available for these two teams has been spread too thinly, resulting in them, to a greater or lesser extent, struggling to improve their standing in the Magners League and especially the Heineken Cup. Hence today’s decision to concentrate resources in one team, Glasgow Warriors.

Allan Munro, Chairman of the Scottish Rugby Board said, “It was quite clear that we could not continue as we were and something had to be done if we were to maintain and improve professional rugby in Scotland.

“The decision to close the Borders pro team has not been an easy one, as we recognise the contribution our Borders players and coaches have made and their real determination to succeed against the odds. But we believe the Reivers closure and strengthening Glasgow Warriors will go some way to improving high performance rugby in Scotland.”

Chief Executive Gordon McKie commented, “A positive long term commitment to the future of the game has been given today and we have agreed on a long term vision for professional rugby.

“As the national governing body for the game in Scotland I believe we need to make better use of our limited resources, to try and galvanize the pro game here in Scotland and offer the sport greater strategic direction in all rugby matters.

“The Board is also announcing today that a Chief Executive for the Glasgow Warriors pro team will be recruited to drive the business forward.”

Turning to where the Warriors will play in the future McKie added, “It’s well known that Hillhead Sports Club will be seeking planning permission to develop part of their land at Hughenden, where the Warriors currently play. It is not clear how or when this may progress but naturally we are actively considering a number of alternative locations including Scotstoun.

“Last summer the Board ruled out Scotstoun as a future venue because of the design proposals that were put on the table at the time. Were these proposals to change sufficiently, we may reconsider Scotstoun as a venue for the team, along with our other options.”

Andy Irvine, the President of Scottish Rugby added, “Today represents an important step in the evolution of professional rugby in Scotland. Along with my Scottish Rugby Council colleagues we fully support the principal of today’s Board decision.

“It is very regrettable that the Border Reivers is to close but it’s important our pro teams get a chance of success and the only way to do that is to concentrate our resources.”

Posted by Moody Blue on March 27, 2007 12:46 PM | Reply to this comment

R.I.P.

Posted by hannah on March 27, 2007 01:57 PM | Reply to this comment

its a sad day for Scottish rugby. Losing the Borders will affect the make up of Scottish rugby. The players moving to Glasgow is mixed with me. I am a cusiter fan and would love to see him playing for Glasgow but with more players that means some of our boys will be losing out game time.

Posted by hugh on March 27, 2007 02:27 PM | Reply to this comment

Same old SRU arrogance re Scotstoun nothing changes

Posted by Phall on March 27, 2007 07:06 PM | Reply to this comment

Hugh I am unsure as to what you mean.

The design for Scotstoun was simplistic and a one size fits all. It lacked any kind of imagination.

For example, there are plenty of stadia on the continent with retractable seating which could be pulled out on to the running track. These designs are simple and do not cost the earth. But no lets design a stadia where you can't get close to the action.

I think the SRU were correct to refuse to anchor Scotstoun unless the ground met rugby requirements. Otherwise why not simply be occassional tenants?

Posted by hugh on March 27, 2007 10:09 PM | Reply to this comment

No old boy with Stade Municipal there has to be compromise look at many of these across Europe--Glasgow City Council was on side and McKie walked away--there was room for discussions between Glasgow Warriors and the Athletics fraternity to work things through especially following the amalgamation of Victoria Park AAC and City of Glasgow AC but it did not reach that stage

Posted by Jemal on March 27, 2007 02:30 PM | Reply to this comment

Think this enforced(?) decision just shows how badly managed pro-rugby has been in Scotland! It's a struggle to see how Scottish rugby will be able to develop a good stream of young players ready to compete in the magners league/heineken/6 Nations etc, with the base of only 2 sides.

Posted by Phall on March 27, 2007 06:35 PM | Reply to this comment

Has it been managed so badly?

What if there is no room for any pro-sport than soccer in the country?

When we took this route, eleven or so years ago the choice was stark. This or pro-clubs. But at that time there wasn't a single Glasgow side in the top league. West, Accies and GHK were in the second tier.

Sure, there have been mistakes, but these have been driven by events dear boy, events.

Why, almost uniquely has there been no room in the Scottish Inn for pro-rugby? I think it is down to the myopic and savage society which we live in.

Posted by stones on March 27, 2007 02:42 PM | Reply to this comment

Absolutely gutted for the Borders fans who have got behind their team. A very sad day.

Posted by jenni b on March 27, 2007 06:19 PM | Reply to this comment

And for the Borders squad - if I was a Borders player and had suddenly been told I had to up sticks with my family and move to Glasgow if I still wanted a job I think I'd be pretty upset (even though I know we at Glasgow would make them very welcome). Think both Borders players and fans have been treated pretty badly, I do (sort of) appreciate the SRU's reasoning, but it has still made me very sad.

Add a comment to this article

If you're replying to an existing comment, please use the 'Reply to this comment' link above the entry. This will display the comments in a way which is far easier for other readers to follow.